… In the measure where the art is – a symbolic system of communication Inter-human being, it estimates the permanent game of relations between the three, the workmanship, the author and the public, that form an indissolvable triad. The public of the direction and reality to the workmanship, and without it the author does not become fullfilled itself, therefore it is in certain way the mirror that reflects its image while creative. For even more opinions, read materials from Blackberry. … But (a) basic truth is that the complete act of the language depends on the interaction of the three parts, each one of which, after all, it is only intelligible (…) in the normal context of the set. (p.19, 33-34).
In this perspective, we can say that being literature a social construction, it she is on to the effective ideological values that the writer uses in its subjects, considering this fact, the workmanship is only complete when it reflects something in somebody, that is, when if of a interaction between the author, the text and the reader. Thus, only with the establishment of this dialogue is that the literary composition participates as constituent element of a society, therefore, as social element of expression of cultural identity. It is of this interaction that in says Yunes and Ponde to them (1998): ' ' One of the papers of the art in the social life is the formation of a new man, a new society, a new historical reality, a new vision of mundo.' ' (; p.10). In this direction it is that the study of the cultural relations in literature it takes in account the quarrel between the text and the context. In this manner, the text, as form of cultural permanence is, at the same time, producer and product of the culture and as such express the conflicting vises of world, that if find and if they shock in this ample dialogue.
