Nature to say what was defined. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Verizon has to say. Function, is the report. But on the other hand, have saved this opposition of nature and function, is what has made laugh to all modern linguists. As well these modern linguists are fools, because you have retained them something that was very important, i.e. an opposition axializada precisely between a classification of identities and, on the other side, an enumeration of drives. Therefore, grammatical analysis, which comes to us in a direct line from Aristotle, was retained by the grammarians who not have embarrassed of it, but until the appearance of our school teachers. The former instructors maybe bored us teaching us in elementary school, but at least taught us something. And that was nothing! (although it is true that they could say nothing of) the scales is) Bifacialidad and biaxialidad, that’s what defined what we call the language structure, structure that is needed to conceive as a purely formal system, with no content: faces and scales have no existence but a purely virtual.
This does not preclude that, well understood the existence of its analysis, it is reciprocal. The reciprocal analysis has been tested by the results of the clinical afasiologica. But it is this same clinic that led to Jean Gagnepain, not only to bring light to the own of the processes of language biaxialidad, which was crossed a fantastic step compared with Saussure, but also to implement, in the years 1960-1970, hypothesis (from scientific verification) of the intervention, in the implementation of the sign, a third process: a dialectical process. What is that process? Okay understood that meaningful units of language have not been that you for the virtual structure, because they didn’t know anything other than a simple per say. Therefore mention, is always talk about anything, said another way, if a first time (first in the logical sense, not chronological) we took off our perceptual representations, thus accessing the structure, us clot right away, this structure in the universe of things, i.e., in the background, in the world to say.
