Cool Investments

Hatred is described frequently like the opposite of the love or the friendship, but other social investigators, like Elie Wiesel 1, consider to the indifference like the opposed thing to the love. For him, hatred can generate aversion, feelings of destruction, destruction of the harmonic balance and occasionally self-destruction, although the majority of the people can possibly hate to something or somebody and not necessarily to undergo these effects. From the history of Abel and Can, thousands of Biblical and profane stories remember to us that hatred was a modern subject pre. Then, in modernity, the battles by the emancipation of the men, the Colonising formation of nations and disputes between national States, companies and the resistance against them are evidences of which hatred was not scarce either at this time. Nevertheless, from the Illustration the rage and the cruelty come being combined, than, with theories more ever dedicated to explain them and to contain them: the hegeliana interpretation of history like conflicts between masters and slaves, the Marxist as fight of classes, and those that tried to give account of why Colonising and colonized, hegemonic and to subalter to us, men and women, they took so badly. Perhaps in this proliferation on attempts to swear in hatred, the anthropological relativismo was its more sophisticated elaboration. Neither or finished the slaughter of World War II, in 1947, the North American Anthropological Association, considering " the great number of societies that have made contact with close enemy in the modern world and the diversity of their ways of vida" , it presented/displayed to the United Nations a project of Declaration on the Rights of the Man who aspired to respond to this question: " How the propose declaration can be applicable to all the human beings and not to be a declaration of rights conceived solely in the terms of the dominant values in the countries of western Europe and North America? " From " the results of sciences humanas" , they proposed three points in agreement: 1) " The individual realises its personality by the culture; the respect to the individual differences implies therefore a respect to the differences culturales". .