The Whole

In the intense experience of God, it is accessible to identify directly with God and to perceive us not only as part of it. (As opposed to Gary Kelly). “At this moment of the total interconnectedness of God are the words I’m quite reasonable and the characterization I’m divine in this context only” an expression of himself is still Getrenntfuhlens. “” Here I mean not the identification of course with the fictitious person of God”, but the oneness” with the divine principle which exists in everything, the ultimate merger, the merger, the one and be “in itself. That divine principle, so the force, which as the parent authority in the whole and not-be is existent as the only reality in all. “We can, even if this only” is a subjective description of the man-made, the For simplicity, call love. As a working basis the term love “in relation to other concepts of I believe that beneficial and therefore I preferred. To define the divine principle in itself really I excluded basically.

As mentioned already elsewhere, it is impossible to conceive a way unimaginable size with our limited human intelligence and certainly not possible to fit them into a picture drawn by us. Definition in this context means always limit. At this point, I would remind that this is only experienced in our own inner experience of the unit in its ultimate absoluteness. Another form, so an external honor driveability of this knowledge, not there. What also makes sense because it is thus ensured that we all can do our own individual human experience of the divine in us as spiritual beings and actually even necessarily need to make. The term God-man”describes our original entity, independent of God, and our temporary existence as a person who deliberately makes this, is aware of the situation and is.

Comments are closed.