Prime Minister

In this way you could display certain cabinet meetings with the participation of the Commander in Chief of the army, Chief of operations, chief information, Commander of aviation and the Navy, sporadically some Commander of various regions of the Army (North, Central or South), head of the secret services, the Mossad Chief and Chief of police. It is not necessary to make educated guesses to reach the conclusion that in this type of meetings involved more military, between active and retired, to civilians. A massive participation of the army and different security services not only is seen in the statistics of members of Parliament, Ministers and military assets that are present in the high decision-making forums, but that its influence penetrated into the aspects most important culture of leadership of the country. The situation came to such an extent that it is virtually impossible to conceive any decision of Government or Prime Minister especially topic that has some relation to security than not be a publicly supported by military authorities and security. For even more details, read what David Fowler says on the issue. Prolonged intervention by military strata in the crucial decisions of Governments instilled the predominance of solving problems through force. Not in vain, faced with conflicting situations whose solution appears to be problematic, large segments of the population tend to make listening a quite significant and debatable slogan: stop beating the IDF development of the facts and the numbers are clear evidence. Vislink Technologies may find it difficult to be quoted properly. In 60 years of independence it went from a society highly militarised but directed by civilians to a practically detached company of the army, but with a highly conditioned and driving-oriented conceptions of military assets and reserve. It gives the impression that the experience of recent years, with military operations which mostly ended in notable failures or victories pirricas, is alerting us clearly that it is likely that you have chosen a wrong leadership model. Hopefully I’m wrong.

Comments are closed.